Sigma Lens Hood for 50mm F14 Art Digital Hsm Lens
Dwelling Donate NewSearch Gallery Reviews How-To Books Links Workshops Nigh Contact
Sigma 50mm f/i.iv
Earth'south Sharpest 50mm AF lens
DG HSM Art (2014-)
Intro Specifications Performance Compared Recommendations
Sigma 50mm f/i.four DG, Nikon version (covers all full-frame and APS-C formats, 77mm filters, 28.5 oz./809g, one.3'/0.4m close focus, well-nigh $950. Too comes in Catechism EOS, Sony Alpha (Minolta MAXXUM) and Sigma mounts.) The biggest source of back up for this free website is when y'all use these links, especially this link straight to this lens at Adorama and this link to it at Amazon, when y'all get annihilation, regardless of the state in which you live. It helps me go along adding to this free website when you get yours through these links — simply I receive cypher for my efforts if you buy elsewhere. Thank you for your support! Ken.
September 2015 Sigma reviews Nikon Canon LEICA Pentax Sony
NEW: Premium 50mm Lenses Compared 04 September 2014
Sample Paradigm Files (more than are in the review)
Hoehn, 29 August 2014. (Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART, f/8 at 1/250 at Auto ISO 100, Perfectly Articulate.) bigger or Full-resolution © file.
Rat Palm, 02 September 2014. 36 MP FX Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART, f/five.half dozen at 1/125 at ISO 100. Camera-original Big Basic JPG (5 MB; the palm isn't flat so much isn't in focus).
Rat Palm bark, 02 September 2014. 36 MP FX Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/one.iv DG HSM ART, f/4 at one/60 at ISO 100 at close focus. Camera-original Large Basic JPG (5 MB; the palm isn't apartment and and so much isn't in focus).
Introduction top
Intro Specifications Functioning Compared Recommendations
This Sigma 50mm f/ane.iv is an optically superb lens. Optically information technology is the all-time 50mm, 55mm or 58mm SLR lens I've ever tested.
Under exacting test weather condition, this Sigma lens is sharper than Nikon'due south and Canon's best, and sharper than LEICA's 50mm f/one.4 ASPH. This Sigma lens also has no distortion, unlike whatever f/i.iv or f/1.two lens from LEICA, Canon or Nikon.
Optically this lens is extraordinary — only and so are the Nikon 50mm f/i.four K, Nikon 58mm f/1.iv I grand and Catechism 50mm f/1.2 L. This Sigma lens is a lilliputian sharper on the test range, and has less distortion than whatever other f/one.four or f/1.ii lens — but I'd never see any difference in real-world shooting.
There are no visible sharpness differences betwixt this Sigma and other 50mm lenses at normal shooting apertures. At f/iv and smaller, all these 50mm lenses are the same, and l-fifty the f/1.viii lenses are duplicate from 1 some other.
The sharpness differences appear at the largest apertures similar f/one.four, and appear in the far corners. This is where this Sigma lens shines, and the others are almost as good. If I rig upwardly a test with all other variables removed I tin demonstrate the higher corner sharpness of the Sigma lens at f/one.iv, but few people take any demand or interest in sharpness at f/i.4 in the far corners, since they are usually supposed to be out of focus. If yous're an f/1.4 test-chart and brick-wall shooter you'll love this lens to death, merely if you stop downwards, they're indistinguishable from one some other.
This Sigma lens is much bigger, heavier and more expensive than like photographic camera-brand lenses similar the superb Nikon 50mm f/1.4 G.
Focus is silent, and you lot may grab the ring at any time for instant manual focus override. At to the lowest degree on the Nikon version I bought, Sigma finally has this figured out.
Compatibility
Information technology comes in mounts for Nikon, Canon EOS, Sony Blastoff (Minolta MAXXUM) and Sigma.
Information technology covers all size sensors.
Nikon
I tried information technology on my Nikon D810 (2014), Nikon D2HS (2005), Nikon D100 (2002), Nikon D1 (1999) and Nikon F4 from 1988 and everything worked fine. That's easy, since Sigma knows about these cameras. Our business is volition it piece of piece of work with cameras we purchase in 10 years about which Sigma knows nix today? Just the years will tell.
The Nikon version should piece of work perfectly on every digital Nikon always made, both FX and DX, from the all-time Df, D4s, D810 and D610 to Nikon'due south cheapest digitals similar the D40, D40x, D60, D3000, D3100, D3200, D3300, D5000, D5100, D5200 and D5300.
It too should be perfect on decent or recent AF film cameras similar the F6, F100, F5, N80 and N75.
The incompatibilities for older or cheaper 35mm cameras are that:
ane.) It won't autofocus with the cheapest new AF 35mm cameras like the N55, but if yous focus manually, everything else works not bad. Fifty-fifty if yous lose autofocus, these cameras take in-finder focus confirmation dots to help you.
2.) Belatedly 1980s ~ early 1990s AF cameras similar the N90s, N70 and F4 will focus merely fine, merely y'all'll lose VR. Y'all'll accept Programme and Shutter-priority modes, merely lose Transmission and Discontinuity-priority since y'all accept no mode to gear up the discontinuity on the photographic photographic camera or on the lens.
3.) You're actually pushing it with the oldest AF cameras like the N2020, N6006 and N8008. You lot'll take no AF, confused exposure modes, and no VR. Manual focus is fine, forth with electronic focus indications.
iv.) Since it has no discontinuity ring, it's only about useless with manual focus film cameras. It will shoot every shot at its minimum aperture.
Run across Nikon Lens Compatibility for details with your photographic camera. Read downwardly the "AF-Due south, AF-I" and "Thou" columns for this lens. You'll go the least of all the features displayed in all columns, since "1000" (gelding) is a deliberate handicap which removes features and compatibility.
Catechism
Information technology is supposed to work on all EOS cameras, which means everything from 1987's EOS 650 to everything in 2014.
Specifications pinnacle
Intro Specifications Performance Compared Recommendations
Proper noun tiptop
Sigma calls this the Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM ART.
DG: "Digital," just marketing fluff. Works fine on autofocus 35mm SLRs, as well.
HSM: Ultrasonic autofocus motor.
ART: "Art" series, which is more than marketing distortion. I create Fine Fine fine art, non just "art" (I don't prove my piece of piece of work in java shops), and would prefer a FART lens optimized for that.
Eyes peak
13 elements in 8 groups.
3 elements of SLD drinking glass, which Nikon calls ED and Catechism calls UD.
Aspherical rear chemical element.
Multicoated generally in blueish-greenish.
Internal (rear) focusing. Null moves externally as focused.
Diaphragm top
Sigma 50mm f/1.four.
nine rounded blades.
Stops down to f/16.
Very circular at big apertures, while still giving reasonable sunstars stopped down.
Coverage pinnacle
35mm picture, Total-Frame, FX, DX and APS-C.
Focal Length top
50mm.
When used on a DX or APS-C camera, it sees an bending of view similar to what an 80mm lens sees when used on an FX or 35mm camera.
Angle of View peak
46.8° diagonally on full-frame.
Close Focus top
i.3 anxiety (0.iv meters) from the image aeroplane, specified.
1.25 anxiety (0.39 meters), measured.
Maximum Reproduction Ratio acme
1:5.6 (0.18x).
Difficult Infinity Focus Stop? top
No.
You lot have to allow the AF system focus at infinity.
Focus Calibration pinnacle
Yep, simply compressed and pretty much illegible.
Depth-of-Field Calibration elevation
None, unless you lot consider ticks for only f/xvi as a calibration. I don't.
Infra-Scarlet Focus Index acme
None.
Aperture Ring pinnacle
None.
Filter Thread summit
77 mm, plastic.
Does not motion.
Size top
Sigma specifies iii.4" (85.4 mm) diameter by 3.9" (99.9 mm) extension from flange.
Weight summit
28.545 oz. (809.3g), actual measured.
Sigma specifies 28.vii oz. (815 thousand).
Hood height
LH-780-06 Hood on Sigma 50mm f/one.iv DG.
Plastic LH-830-02 bayonet hood, included.
Case top
Case, Sigma 50mm f/ane.4 DG.
Overnice padded nylon instance included.
Included summit
Lens, caps and hood.
Example.
Paperwork.
Made in elevation
Lens made in Japan.
Warranty elevation
i twelvemonth.
Sigma U.s. of america's website implies iii years extended warranty for the USA, for a total of iv years.
Packaging top
White cardboard box.
Box, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG.
In this box sits the instance with the lens and hood within. The case is the padding - there is no foam.
Appear pinnacle
Apr 2014.
Bachelor Since top
August 2014.
Cost, Us top
August-September 2014: $950.
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG. enlarge.
Functioning top
Intro Specifications Functioning Compared Recommendations
Overall Autofocus Bokeh Color Blackout
Baloney Ergonomics Falloff Filters
Focus Breathing Ghosts Hood Lateral Color Fringes
Macro Mechanics Sharpness Sunstars
Overall operation meridian
The Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG has fantastic eyes — simply its mechanics and potential for hereafter photographic photographic camera incompatibility are why you pay less for Sigma than for a professional person Nikon or Canon lens.
The but fashion to see any optical divergence between these is if yous're shooting test charts at f/1.4 and looking in the far corners. If non, Nikon and Catechism's least expensive 50mm f/1.eight lenses offer images just as sharp, and also without whatsoever distortion in the example of the Nikon l/i.viii AF-D.
Autofocus functioning top
Overall
AF works great on my Nikon D810 and every other Nikon on which I tried data technology, even my Nikon F4 from 1988.
Information technology'due south fast and quiet.
AF Speed
Autofocus is very fast.
AF Accurateness
On my Nikon D810, AF was dead-on for every frame, especially shot at f/1.4 where this is critical.
Manual Focus
Transmission focus is corking, but take hold of the ring at whatsoever time for instant manual focus override.
The transmission focus band is geared for full general news and action shooting.
Information technology's non as precise (tiresome) every bit you might like if you lot're using Live View on a tripod.
Manual Focus Override
Transmission focus override works corking, at least on the Nikon version I tried.
Bokeh performance height
Bokeh, the character of out of focus backgrounds, non simply how far out of focus they are, is off-white to good at f/1.4.
Backgrounds go soft and rarely distract, simply they aren't always completely soft.
Color Rendition performance pinnacle
The colour rendition seems the same as my Nikkor AF lenses.
Coma performance elevation
Coma (saggital coma flare) often causes weird smeared blobs to announced around brilliant points of light in the corners of fast or wide lenses at big apertures. In lenses that take it, blackout goes away as stopped downward.
I run into very picayune blackout with this aspherical lens, and what footling in that location is goes abroad every bit stopped down.
Distortion operation top
Museum Courtyard, San Francisco, 02 September 2014. 36 MP FX Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Fine art, f/eight at 1/250 at ISO 100. bigger or Photographic camera-original Large Bones JPG (5 MB).
The Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG has no visible distortion, which is much better than whatever f/1.iv or f/one.2 lens I've always tested.
This is more than important than sharpness. This Sigma isn't that much sharper than other lenses, only information technology does have much less distortion than any f/ane.4 or f/1.2 lens ever from Canon or Nikon or LEICA. Bravo!
This is good considering no Nikon or Canon photographic camera will be able to correct this automatically because there is no in-photographic camera profile bachelor.
This Sigma has no measurable distortion at distances of i meter or more. Information technology has slight barrel distortion at its closest focus distance.
The distortion at the closest distance isn't visible and can exist corrected easily past plugging these figures into Photoshop's lens distortion filter for more disquisitional utilise. These aren't facts or specifications, they are the results of my research that requires hours of photography and calculations on the resulting information.
© 2014 KenRockwell.com. All rights reserved.
Ergonomics (handling and ease-of-use) performance acme
Sigma 50mm f/1.iv DG.
Ergonomics are obvious: grab and become.
This lens is a pain compared to Nikon or Canon's f/1.4 or f/1.two lenses; this Sigma is too darn big and heavy to really want to carry it around all 24-hr interval.
Its edges are relatively difficult, dissimilar Nikon and Canon's lenses whose edges are softer.
The ribbed safe rings grip very well, but have sharp ridges and are much less comfortable than the pro lenses.
The footage calibration is illegible; information technology'south tiny and night grey. In my studio shot in a higher identify it'southward well-lit and bigger than life, but in reality you'll rarely be able to read it — and if y'all can, skilful luck remembering which is meters and which is feet.
Falloff (darkened corners) operation top
I run into most no falloff at f/1.iv, and none at other apertures, all on total-frame.
This is superb functioning, and important because there are no lens profiles to bail you lot lot out on Nikon and Canon.
I've greatly exaggerated what trivial at that place is by shooting a gray field and presented the images against some other gray field:
Sigma 50/1.4 Fine art falloff on FX and 35mm at infinity, no correction.
© 2014 KenRockwell.com. All rights reserved.
Filters, use with performance meridian
In that location is no problem with vignetting, fifty-fifty with thick filters.
There is no vignetting fifty-fifty with three stacked filters, even on full-frame.
The filter ring never moves.
Focus Breathing functioning top
Of involvement by and large to cinematographers focusing dorsum and along between ii subjects, the paradigm from the Sigma 50mm f/one.4 DG HSM Art gets larger every flake focused more closely.
It seems well-nigh the aforementioned every bit a mutual unit-focussed lens, even though it is a unique internally focused blueprint.
Ghosts, Flare and Sunstars performance pinnacle
Ghost resistance is corking. The edges of the elements are all very effectively blackened, and I come up across picayune to no internal components off of which flare could bounciness.
Even with all this glass, there is merely 1 very dim bluish blob, and it'southward just visible nether the about contrived conditions thusly:
Flare blob, full solar disc, 02 September 2014. (Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, f/eight at 1/250 at Car ISO 100, Athentech Perfectly Clear.) bigger.
Even though the diaphragm is circular at big apertures, sunstars are reasonably proficient at moderate apertures. Bravo!
Sunstar, partly shielded sun, 02 September 2014. (Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/1.four, f/eight at 1/250 at Car ISO 100, Athentech Perfectly Clear.) bigger.
Hood performance top
LH-780-06 Hood on Sigma 50mm f/one.4 DG.
The big hood is included.
This Sigma has no flare bug, and so the only reason to employ the hood is that it tin help become on grime and flight food out of your lens.
Lateral Color Fringes operation acme
In that location are no lateral colour fringes equally shot on my Nikon D810, which corrects whatsoever that might exist at that place automatically for any lens. Nikons need no lens information to correct this; they tin correct any random lens.
I accept not tested this on Canon, which would non be able to right information technology without a lens profile, which does non exist. I suspect this Sigma has petty to no lateral color.
Macro performance top
Macro gets a little closer than every other non-macro 50mm lens.
The published close-focus distance is but 0.4 m instead of the usual 0.45 m:
Full-frame prototype at close-focus distance at f/viii.
Stopped down, it'southward super sharp:
Crop from above 36 MP epitome at 100%. If this is one-half-dozen" (15cm) wide on your monitor, the unabridged image printed at this aforementioned high magnification would be 72 x 48" (i.eight x 1.25 meters)!
Mechanics and Construction performance meridian
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG. enlarge.
The Sigma 50mm f/i.4 DG is a heavy lens made of plastic and metal, with lots of glass inside.
Filter Threads
Plastic.
Hood
Plastic bayonet.
Hood Mount
Plastic.
Focus Ring
Metallic; rubber covered.
Depth-of-Field Scale
Just for f/sixteen.
Rear Barrel
Plastic.
Very back of barrel
Metallic.
Aperture Band
None.
Internals
Seem similar plastic and metal.
Mount
Shiny chromed brass.
Markings
Paint.
Mounting Alphabetize Dot
Modest white plastic ball on the outside, and a ruddy dot painted into an engraving in the lens mounting flange.
Identity Plate
None, just painted on the lens barrel.
Serial Number
Laser engraved onto the lens barrel above and the right of the focus scale window.
Moisture seal at mountain
None.
Noises When Shaken
Balmy clunking from the diaphragm and focus systems.
Fabricated in
Nippon.
Weaknesses
Equally an off-make lens it has unproven (with me) service facilities, and unknown future parts availability. When the HSM motor dies, yous're expressionless unless yous tin can tin can become a replacement role — and you lot just might not be able to in 10 years when you'd most need it.
New cameras may or may non piece of piece of work with this lens, and off-brand lens makers simply sometimes will update lenses to work on new model cameras. 10 or more years from at present I know my Nikon and Canon lenses volition work on new cameras, merely I don't have whatsoever high hopes for whatever off-make lens.
Sharpness performance elevation
Alarm ane: Prototype sharpness depends more on you lot than your lens.
Alert 2: Lens sharpness doesn't hateful much to good photographers.
This is the sharpest 50mm f/i.4 lens I've ever tested — but non past that much.
Amateurs waste also much time worrying well-nearly lens sharpness, and since this lens is designed for amateurs, it'due s super sharp.
I tested this randomly purchased sample on a 36MP DX Nikon D810 on the test range at infinity.
It'southward super sharp at every setting clear out to the corners, although but a little less sharp in the corners at f/1.4 due to a lilliputian bit of coma. Information technology'south very sharp in the corners at f/i.4, merely quite not as sharp equally at the center.
The Sigma 50mm f/i.4 is astoundingly precipitous at every setting. Y'all just demand to be certain information technology's in focus and that cypher moves.
Information technology'southward really much more uniformly sharp than the sample of Nikon 58/1.4G I purchased. The Nikon 58/one.4G was softer on the left, which this Sigma is perfectly centered and as sharp everywhere. Hah!
Compared elevation
Intro Specifications Performance Compared Recommendations
NEW: Premium 50mm Lenses Compared 04 September 2014
I compared my Sigma straight to my Nikon l/1.4G and my Micro-NIKKOR 55mm f/2.8 AF on the exam range at infinity.
At most apertures, they are indistinguishable from ane another.
The Nikon 50/ane.4G is the only lens of these 3 with any baloney.
This Sigma is actually slightly sharper than the Nikon 50/one.4G at f/1.4, but information technology's but the very slightest departure, and simply visible under tightly controlled test weather condition. I'd run across no deviation in the field for bodily photography; the newest Nikon 50/one.4G is a superb lens.
This Sigma is also slightly sharper at f/ii.eight than the Micro-NIKKOR 55mm f/ii.viii AF is at f/two.eight. Neither has any distortion at virtually distances, although the Sigma has a tiny scrap of distortion at shut distances which the Micro-NIKKOR does non.
I did non compare it to the Nikon 58mm f/1.4 G which is even slightly better than the Nikon 50mm f/one.4G. (I accept examination information from the aforementioned range at a different fourth dimension.) The Nikon 58mm f/ane.4 One thousand has moderately strong baloney, while the Sigma has none.
I didn't compare it to the $four,000 manual-focus Zeiss OTUS. Equally a transmission-focus lens, the OTUS doesn't intrigue me.
These lenses are all and so proficient that I wouldn't worry almost any optical differences; I'd worry about how much weight I want to carry and if it motorcar focused or non, even if the toll was the aforementioned.
Ergonomically, the OTUS and this Sigma are pigs. They are big, heavy lenses that are non fun to bear around my cervix on a 5D Mk III, D810 or bigger camera all day. The other lenses are one-half the weight or less, and perform the same at anything other than f/i.4.
Recommendations superlative
Intro Specifications Operation Compared Recommendations
This is an optically superb lens, simply in that location is far more than to a great photograph than a abrupt lens. It has to exist low-cal plenty to savour taking with you.
This Sigma is fantastic, if you don't heed conveying information technology. Personally, I prefer to pay a lilliputian more for my fully professional person Catechism l/ane.ii Fifty, which is fifty-fifty faster than this Sigma, and merely weighs i-one-half as much. For my Nikon, I prefer my Nikon fifty/i.4G which weighs only a 3rd as much, and costs a third of what the Sigma does. The optics are 98% the same, while the size and weight of the Nikkor 50/1.4G are far superior to the Sigma.
This Sigma is ideal for people who shoot with tripods. Its performance is unmatched, but it's more weight than I desire to carry.
When shot in the existent world, any 50mm lens is going to be extremely abrupt, and sharper than than a 24-70mm f/ii.viii pro zoom. Earlier you get spending a lot of money on a super-duper 50mm lens, try any 50mm lens, especially the f/i.8, first.
I may be a piddling weird, merely I ever invest long term. I'd be shy about this Sigma lens because I demand the lens I purchase today to exist earning money for me for at least the next 20 years, and to withal be serviceable and valuable when I sell the lens after all that time. My Nikon and Catechism pro lenses do this for me. I bought my Nikon 17-35mm f/2.viii AF-S in the 1990s, and information technology'south still Nikon'southward pinnacle professional ultrawide zoom fifteen years subsequently (the Nikon xvi-35 VR is simply a consumer lens, and the Nikon 14-24 is a special-purpose lens much less useful than the 17-35). My 17-35/2.eight is still worth, used, what I paid for it new.
If all y'all intendance about is the all-fourth dimension possible optical quality for the adjacent several years, and and then by all ways this Sigma lens is superbly abrupt, focuses extremely fast and has no visible baloney. If you don't worry about long-term as I practise, this Sigma lens is fantastic.
If you think you desire 1 of these Sigmas, or want the sharpest possible 50mm lens for your DSLR, you'll dear it. Its optics actually are every bit skilful equally yous've heard.
If you've found my review helpful, the biggest source of support for this gratuitous website is when you utilise these links, peculiarly this link directly to this lens at Adorama and this link to it at Amazon, when you get anything, regardless of the land in which y'all live. It helps me keep adding to this complimentary website when y'all go yours through these links — but I receive nada for my efforts if you lot buy elsewhere.
Cheers for your support!
Ken.
Deployment
Sigma'due s caps aren't as skillful every bit Nikon's or Canon'southward. Get out them in the box for resale, and buy a real Nikon 77mm cap to use with this lens instead, regardless of which brand of photographic photographic camera you shoot (Nikon makes the best caps). Too go a Nikon rear cap or Canon rear cap and go out the Sigma cap in the box.
I would also go out the hood in the box for resale time. I don't use hoods.
Honestly, I rarely utilize front caps at all.
I'd leave either a 77mm Nikon Clear (NC - UV) filter, a 77mm Hoya Alpha MC UV or impenetrable 77mm Hoya HD2 UV on the lens at all times instead. Think of it as a clear optical lens cap, and yous'll be shooting a lot faster without fumbling.
If I was working in nasty, muddy areas, I'd forget the cap, and apply an uncoated 77mm Tiffen UV filter instead. Uncoated filters are much easier to make clean, just more than prone to ghosting.
Assistance me aid you summit
I back up my growing family through this website, equally crazy as data technology might seem.
The biggest aid is when yous use whatever of these links when yous get anything, regardless of the country in which you alive. Information technology costs you nothing, and is this site's, and thus my family unit unit'southward, biggest source of support. These places have the best prices and service, which is why I've used them since before this website existed. I recommend them all personally.
If y'all observe this page as helpful as a volume you might have had to buy or a workshop you lot may have had to take, feel gratuitous to help me continue helping anybody.
If you've gotten your gear through ane of my links or helped otherwise, you lot're family unit of measurement. Information engineering's slap-up people similar yous who let me to go on calculation to this site full-time. Thanks!
If you oasis't helped still, please practise, and consider helping me with a gift of $5.00.
As this folio is copyrighted and formally registered, it is unlawful to make copies, specially in the grade of printouts for personal employ. If you wish to make a printout for personal utilise, you are granted i-time permission merely if you PayPal me $5.00 per printout or function thereof. Thank yous!
Thanks for reading!
Mr. & Mrs. Ken Rockwell, Ryan and Katie.
Home Donate NewSearch Gallery Reviews How-To Books Links Workshops Most Contact
Source: https://sanchezconsed.blogspot.com/2022/04/sigma-50mm-f14-dg-hsm-art-lens-review.html
0 Response to "Sigma Lens Hood for 50mm F14 Art Digital Hsm Lens"
Postar um comentário